🔗 Share this article Latvian Lawmakers Vote to Exit Treaty on Protecting Females from Violence Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week The vote represents a setback for Latvia's centre-right government leader, who addressed protesters outside the parliament Latvia's parliament members have decided to pull out from an international accord designed to protect women from abuse, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated debates in the legislature. Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or reject the proposed law. Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last year, mandating authorities to develop laws and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse. Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a decision that rights groups characterized as a major setback for gender equality. Political Controversy and Opposition The treaty was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and advances what they term "gender ideology". Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners. The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the crowd. Political Divisions and Responses One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities". Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them". The recent decision has provoked broad protest both inside the country and internationally. Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a demonstration for the coming week, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens. International Worries and Possible Next Steps The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent". He added that since the transcontinental nation left the convention in 2021, cases of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly. Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly return the legislation for further consideration if he holds objections. President the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional principles, "considering state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints". Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court. "This vote represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in our nation but across the continent," stated a human rights advocate. Family violence rates have been increasing in several EU countries The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for survivors of domestic abuse Latvia's vote could affect comparable debates in other EU countries