🔗 Share this article

Internationally, nations are investing massive amounts into what's termed “sovereign AI” – developing their own AI systems. Starting with the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, countries are vying to create AI that comprehends native tongues and local customs.

The Global AI Arms Race

This initiative is a component of a larger global race spearheaded by large firms from the America and the People's Republic of China. While firms like a leading AI firm and Meta allocate enormous capital, developing countries are also taking independent investments in the AI landscape.

However with such huge investments at stake, is it possible for smaller nations achieve significant advantages? According to a analyst from a well-known policy organization, If not you’re a rich nation or a large company, it’s a significant burden to create an LLM from the ground up.”

Security Considerations

A lot of states are reluctant to rely on overseas AI technologies. Across India, as an example, US-built AI solutions have occasionally proven inadequate. One instance featured an AI agent employed to teach pupils in a isolated area – it interacted in English with a strong American accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for native users.

Additionally there’s the defence aspect. In the Indian military authorities, relying on particular external models is viewed unacceptable. Per an founder explained, There might be some arbitrary learning material that could claim that, such as, a certain region is outside of India … Employing that certain model in a defence setup is a serious concern.”

He further stated, I’ve discussed with individuals who are in security. They wish to use AI, but, setting aside specific systems, they are reluctant to rely on American platforms because details may be transferred abroad, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

Homegrown Initiatives

Consequently, several countries are supporting local initiatives. One such a effort is being developed in India, in which an organization is attempting to develop a domestic LLM with public funding. This initiative has allocated approximately $1.25bn to machine learning progress.

The founder imagines a AI that is significantly smaller than top-tier systems from Western and Eastern corporations. He explains that the nation will have to make up for the funding gap with talent. Based in India, we do not possess the luxury of pouring billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we contend against say the enormous investments that the America is pumping in? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the strategic thinking is essential.”

Local Emphasis

In Singapore, a state-backed program is funding AI systems trained in local native tongues. These particular languages – including the Malay language, the Thai language, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and others – are frequently poorly represented in US and Chinese LLMs.

I hope the people who are creating these independent AI tools were aware of how rapidly and how quickly the cutting edge is moving.

A leader participating in the initiative says that these models are intended to supplement bigger AI, instead of displacing them. Platforms such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he states, frequently find it challenging to handle regional languages and local customs – interacting in stilted Khmer, as an example, or recommending meat-containing recipes to Malay consumers.

Creating native-tongue LLMs allows local governments to code in local context – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a powerful system developed in other countries.

He continues, “I’m very careful with the word sovereign. I think what we’re attempting to express is we aim to be more adequately included and we wish to comprehend the abilities” of AI systems.

International Cooperation

Regarding nations seeking to find their place in an intensifying international arena, there’s an alternative: join forces. Researchers affiliated with a respected institution have suggested a government-backed AI initiative shared among a alliance of developing states.

They term the initiative “Airbus for AI”, in reference to the European effective strategy to create a competitor to a major aerospace firm in the 1960s. This idea would see the creation of a public AI company that would pool the resources of various nations’ AI projects – for example the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Spain, the Canadian government, Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, France, the Swiss Confederation and the Kingdom of Sweden – to establish a competitive rival to the American and Asian major players.

The main proponent of a study setting out the concept notes that the concept has gained the interest of AI leaders of at least three nations to date, along with multiple national AI organizations. Although it is now focused on “developing countries”, less wealthy nations – Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda for example – have additionally shown curiosity.

He comments, Currently, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s reduced confidence in the promises of the existing US administration. Individuals are wondering for example, is it safe to rely on any of this tech? What if they opt to