🔗 Share this article

When Tropical Storm Melissa swirled off the coast of Haiti, meteorologist Philippe Papin felt certain it would soon escalate to a major tropical system.

As the lead forecaster on duty, he forecasted that in just 24 hours the storm would become a severe hurricane and start shifting towards the Jamaican shoreline. Not a single expert had previously made such a bold prediction for quick intensification.

However, Papin had an ace up his sleeve: artificial intelligence in the guise of the tech giant’s new DeepMind cyclone prediction system – released for the initial occasion in June. And, as predicted, Melissa did become a storm of astonishing strength that ravaged Jamaica.

Growing Dependence on Artificial Intelligence Predictions

Meteorologists are heavily relying upon Google DeepMind. During 25 October, Papin clarified in his official briefing that the AI tool was a key factor for his certainty: “Approximately 40/50 AI simulation runs indicate Melissa becoming a Category 5 storm. While I am not ready to predict that intensity yet given path variability, that is still plausible.

“It appears likely that a phase of quick strengthening will occur as the system drifts over very warm sea temperatures which is the most extreme marine thermal energy in the whole Atlantic basin.”

Outperforming Conventional Models

The AI model is the pioneer AI model dedicated to tropical cyclones, and now the initial to outperform traditional weather forecasters at their own game. Through all 13 Atlantic storms this season, the AI is top-performing – surpassing human forecasters on path forecasts.

Melissa eventually made landfall in Jamaica at maximum intensity, among the most powerful landfalls ever documented in almost 200 years of data collection across the Atlantic basin. The confident prediction probably provided residents extra time to prepare for the disaster, possibly saving people and assets.

The Way Google’s Model Functions

The AI system works by spotting patterns that conventional time-intensive physics-based prediction systems may miss.

“They do it much more quickly than their physics-based cousins, and the processing requirements is less expensive and time consuming,” stated Michael Lowry, a ex forecaster.

“This season’s events has demonstrated in quick time is that the newcomer AI weather models are on par with and, in certain instances, more accurate than the less rapid traditional weather models we’ve relied upon,” Lowry said.

Clarifying Machine Learning

To be sure, Google DeepMind is an example of machine learning – a method that has been employed in research fields like meteorology for a long time – and is not creative artificial intelligence like ChatGPT.

AI training processes large datasets and extracts trends from them in a manner that its model only requires minutes to come up with an answer, and can operate on a desktop computer – in strong contrast to the primary systems that authorities have utilized for years that can require many hours to run and need the largest supercomputers in the world.

Expert Responses and Upcoming Advances

Nevertheless, the fact that Google’s model could outperform earlier top-tier traditional systems so quickly is nothing short of amazing to weather scientists who have dedicated their lives trying to predict the world’s strongest weather systems.

“I’m impressed,” commented James Franklin, a retired expert. “The sample is now large enough that it’s pretty clear this is not a case of chance.”

He said that while Google DeepMind is beating all competing systems on forecasting the future path of storms globally this year, like many AI models it sometimes errs on high-end intensity forecasts wrong. It struggled with Hurricane Erin earlier this year, as it was also undergoing rapid intensification to maximum intensity above the Caribbean.

During the next break, he said he plans to talk with the company about how it can enhance the DeepMind output more useful for experts by offering extra under-the-hood data they can utilize to assess the reasons it is coming up with its answers.

“A key concern that nags at me is that although these predictions seem to be really, really good, the output of the system is kind of a opaque process,” remarked Franklin.

Broader Sector Developments

Historically, no a commercial entity that has produced a high-performance weather model which allows researchers a view of its techniques – unlike nearly all other models which are provided free to the general audience in their full form by the authorities that created and operate them.

The company is not the only one in starting to use artificial intelligence to address challenging meteorological problems. The authorities also have their own artificial intelligence systems in the development phase – which have demonstrated improved skill over earlier non-AI versions.

Future developments in AI weather forecasts appear to involve new firms taking swings at formerly difficult problems such as sub-seasonal outlooks and improved early alerts of tornado outbreaks and sudden deluges – and they are receiving federal support to do so. One company, WindBorne Systems, is also launching its proprietary weather balloons to address deficiencies in the US weather-observing network.